Opponents of the interview say it should not even exist. They shortly dismiss every little thing Putin needed to say and do not suppose the autocrat ought to have been given airtime within the first place. The interview is so problematic that there are rumors that Tucker Carlson could also be sanctioned by the European Union for it.
Any rational, sane one who values important considering ought to hopefully perceive why that is deeply regarding. Deplatforming a person merely since you disagree with him/her doesn’t remedy the issues. In truth, it creates new.
Censoring info results in the creation of echo chambers. Folks merely do not take heed to opposing factors of view anymore. Over time, this “otherizes” the individuals you disagree with, dehumanizing them.
In spite of everything, that is how we arrived at a deeply divided political polarity in the USA. It isn’t as a result of your MAGA uncle is loopy or your feminist sister-in-law hates you. That is as a result of we have reached some extent the place our civil discourse has damaged down, depriving different individuals of the respect and dignity they deserve.
That is what the interview unintentionally reveals. This isn’t about giving Putin a platform to unfold propaganda. It is about giving a overseas chief airtime to elucidate his motivations for invading a neighboring nation. It’s not possible to know a battle for those who proceed to disregard the angle of one of many essential combatants preventing in it.
Throughout the interview, Putin argues that Russia’s aggression in opposition to Ukraine is a matter of territorial integrity and sovereignty – two of the core values underlying the present Western liberal world order. This angle is misplaced on Western audiences – not as a result of we can not perceive the world round us –…